[PATCH 1/3] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more readability and compatible
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Thu Sep 17 03:06:17 PDT 2015
On 09/17/2015 11:28 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 在 2015年09月17日 17:11, Daniel Lezcano 写道:
>> Hi Caesar,
>> On 09/17/2015 09:51 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.
>>> drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c:156:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared
>> I think the NO_IRQ definition is missing for ARM64.
> Yep, Maybe better to compatible if we don't use the 'NO_IRQ',
Hmm, after digging into drivers/of/irq.c and kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
when there is an error it returns zero. So NO_IRQ and -1 are not correct
and on the other side zero can be a valid irq. That sounds a little bit
fuzzy to me.
>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand 1 --
>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).
>> What happens to ARM32 then ?
> The dsb() is ok for ARM32, the ARM32/64 are OK if we can convert the
> dsb() to dsb(sy).
> I believe all drivers with 'dsb()' have same issue on ARM64 platform.
>>> Meanwhile, I change a bit to make the code more readability for driver
>>> when I check the code style.
>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
More information about the Linux-rockchip