[PATCH v3 00/12] Add mipi dsi support for rk3288
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Thu Nov 19 06:41:41 PST 2015
On 19 November 2015 at 03:35, Chris Zhong <zyw at rock-chips.com> wrote:
> The rk3288 MIPI DSI is a Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller
> IP. This series adds support for a Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host
> controller DRM bridge driver and a rockchip MIPI DSI specific DRM
> This series also includes a DRM panel driver for BOE TV080WUM-NL0 panel.
> This panel only use the MIPI DSI video mode.
> The MIPI DSI feature is tested on rk3288 evb board, backport them to
> chrome os kernel v3.14, and it can display normally.
> This patchset is base on the patchset from Ying.liu at freescale.com.
> Changes in v3:
> move the dw_mipi_dsi.txt to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge
> move dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt to bindings/display/rockchip/
> move boe,tv080wum-nl0.txt to bindings/display/panel/
> Changes in v2:
> add the mipi clk id in a single patch
> As Thierry.Reding comment, add a documentation for this panel.
> Chris Zhong (10):
> clk: rockchip: add id for mipidsi sclk on rk3288
> clk: rockchip: add mipidsi clocks on rk3288
> drm/rockchip: return a true clock rate to adjusted_mode
> drm/bridge: Add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver
Did you actually rewrite the patch from Liu Ying ?
Out of curiosity what was the obstacle of this work getting merged ?
> drm: rockchip: Support Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller
> Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for rk3288 DW MIPI DSI driver
> ARM: dts: rockchip: add rk3288 mipi_dsi nodes
> drm/panel: simple: Add support for BOE TV080WUM-NL0
> drm/panel: simple: Add boe,tv080wum-nl0 simple panel device tree
As the DT people will tell you - there is no BOE vendor in
> ARM: dts: rockchip: add support mipi panel tv080wum-nl0 for rk3288-evb
> Liu Ying (2):
> drm/dsi: Add a helper to get bits per pixel of MIPI DSI pixel format
> Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for Synopsys DW MIPI DSI DRM
> bridge driver
>From the above 12 patches only ~6 reached this mailing list is that
intentional ? Previously I've seen people CC dri-devel for their
panel/bridge DT patches.
More information about the Linux-rockchip