[PATCH v4 04/24] hwmon: pwm-fan: use pwm_get_xxx() helpers where appropriate
Guenter Roeck
linux at roeck-us.net
Mon Nov 16 07:59:23 PST 2015
On 11/16/2015 12:56 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
> Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic
> update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:
>
> --->8---
> virtual patch
>
> @@
> struct pwm_device *p;
> expression e;
> @@
> (
> -(p)->polarity = e;
> +pwm_set_polarity((p), e);
> |
> -(p)->polarity
> +pwm_get_polarity((p))
s/((p))/(p)/
> |
> -(p)->period = e;
> +pwm_set_period((p), e);
> |
> -(p)->period
> +pwm_get_period((p))
s/((p))/(p)/
> |
> -(p)->duty_cycle = e;
> +pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e);
The (p) seems unnecessary here.
> |
> -(p)->duty_cycle
> +pwm_get_duty_cycle((p))
s/((p))/(p)/
> )
> --->8---
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> index 3e23003..105b964 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
> @@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ static int __set_pwm(struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx, unsigned long pwm)
> if (ctx->pwm_value == pwm)
> goto exit_set_pwm_err;
>
> - duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
> - ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
> + duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)) - 1), MAX_PWM);
> + ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)));
Please drop all the unnecessary ( ).
Thanks,
Guenter
> if (ret)
> goto exit_set_pwm_err;
>
> @@ -234,10 +234,10 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctx);
>
> /* Set duty cycle to maximum allowed */
> - duty_cycle = ctx->pwm->period - 1;
> + duty_cycle = pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)) - 1;
> ctx->pwm_value = MAX_PWM;
>
> - ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, ctx->pwm->period);
> + ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)));
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n");
> return ret;
> @@ -309,8 +309,9 @@ static int pwm_fan_resume(struct device *dev)
> if (ctx->pwm_value == 0)
> return 0;
>
> - duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
> - ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
> + duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)) - 1),
> + MAX_PWM);
> + ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> return pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);
>
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list