[PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Tue May 19 15:07:21 PDT 2015
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 May 2015 23:44:58 Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Michael Niewoehner tested this on a rk3188 (Cortex-A9) and wrote in 
> > > Tested-by: Michael Niewoehner <mniewoeh at stud.hs-offenburg.de>
> > >
> > > Tested on Radxa Rock Pro with RK3188.
> > > The kernel panics on reboot I had before and also a kernel BUG when running
> > > "memtester 1900M" went away and the rock seems to run stable now.
> We should probably create a separate fix for that and add it to the stable
> kernels then. I would suggest something like the untested patch below,
> which takes advantage of the fact that we already have separate assignments
> for the start_secondary function pointer for A9 and A17.
Your patch is also continuing the pattern with this code...
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
> index 46c22dedf632..ae0077e8fe98 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
> @@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> - mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 0 @ read main ID register
> - ldr r1, =0x00000c09 @ Cortex-A9 primary part number
> - teq r0, r1
> beq v7_invalidate_l1
> b secondary_startup
If you look carefully at this, you'll notice that it's utter crap.
(Sorry, but it is.) It has two problems:
1. It'll never match a Cortex-A9 CPU. Cortex-A9 has a MIDR value of
0x412fc09a, not 0x00000c09. The bit position of the part number
field isn't even right.
2. If it does match, then we branch to "v7_invalidate_l1" without setting
the link register: we'll never return back here (we'll return to whatever
random value the link register contains) and so we'll never make it to
secondary_startup. *Thankfully*, because of (1), this branch will
never be taken - this is it's saving grace.
Your patch introduces a /third/ form of crapiness:
3. If the PSR happens to have Z=1, the "beq" instruction will be taken,
thereby crashing the system because of (2).
The /simplest/ change which would fix this problem is to just change
proc-v7.S. The remainder is effectively a cleanup removing redundant
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
More information about the Linux-rockchip