[PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

Doug Anderson dianders at chromium.org
Thu Aug 27 12:30:51 PDT 2015


On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> great, just take into account the deep vs. shallow suspend modes :-)

One note: do you think it would make sense to re-implement shallow
suspend as "standby"?  I had a proof of concept doing that in
<https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/275123/>.  One nice
advantage is that you "magically" get a second set of regulator states
for standby vs "mem".

If I understand correctly, the distinction between "standby" and "mem"
is not too clearly defined, so if we wanted to use it for this it
wouldn't be terrible?


More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list