[PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288

Kever Yang kever.yang at rock-chips.com
Tue Sep 16 18:03:37 PDT 2014


Sonny,

On 09/17/2014 04:17 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> This patch add basic rk3288 smp support, cpu 1~3 are in wfe state
>> when get into kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - use rk3288_boot_secondary instead ofsmp_boot_secondary
>> - discards the power domain operation
>> - handle the per cpu starup when actived by 'sev'
>>
>>   arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h    |  1 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S | 14 +++++++++
>>   arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h
>> index 39bca96..13de05a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h
>> @@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ extern char rockchip_secondary_trampoline_end;
>>
>>   extern unsigned long rockchip_boot_fn;
>>   extern void rockchip_secondary_startup(void);
>> +extern void rk3288_secondary_startup(void);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
>> index 73206e3..bacdb56 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
>> @@ -20,6 +20,20 @@ ENTRY(rockchip_secondary_startup)
>>          b       secondary_startup
>>   ENDPROC(rockchip_secondary_startup)
>>
>> +ENTRY(rk3288_secondary_startup)
>> +       mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 5
>> +       mov r2, #3
>> +       and r0, r0, r2
>> +       ldr r1, =0xff700000
>> +       ldr r1, [r1]
>> +       cmp r0, r1
>> +       beq 2f
>> +       ldr r2, =0xfffd0000
>> +       mov pc, r2
>> +2:
>> +       b       secondary_startup
>> +ENDPROC(rk3288_secondary_startup)
> Comments on what's going on here would be nice.
I will do that in next version.
> It looks like what you're doing is checking to see whether this CPU is
> the one that is supposed to wake up or not, but looking at sram
> (written by the C code below), and this isn't the correct CPU then go
> back to boot rom?  Since we read in int-mem from the device-tree it
> would also probably be good to make that ldr r1, 0xff700000 reference
> the sram_base_addr variable rather than hard coding here.
I don't like the hard coding either, but I don't know how to get the
physical base of sram and bootrom address in the assemble code.
>
>> +
>>   ENTRY(rockchip_secondary_trampoline)
>>          ldr     pc, 1f
>>   ENDPROC(rockchip_secondary_trampoline)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
>> index 189684f..022a01d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static void pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
>>    * Handling of CPU cores
>>    */
>>
>> -static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
>> +static int __cpuinit rk3066_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
>>                                               struct task_struct *idle)
>>   {
>>          if (!sram_base_addr || !pmu_base_addr) {
>> @@ -80,6 +80,28 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static int __cpuinit rk3288_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
>> +                                            struct task_struct *idle)
>> +{
>> +       if (!sram_base_addr) {
>> +               pr_err("%s: sram missing for cpu boot\n", __func__);
>> +               return -ENXIO;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (cpu >= ncores) {
>> +               pr_err("%s: cpu %d outside maximum number of cpus %d\n",
>> +                                                       __func__, cpu, ncores);
>> +               return -ENXIO;
>> +       }
>> +       /* start the core */
>> +       writel(virt_to_phys(rk3288_secondary_startup), sram_base_addr + 8);
>> +       writel(0xDEADBEAF, sram_base_addr + 4);
>> +       writel(cpu, sram_base_addr + 0);
> I guess the boot rom is looking for 0xDEADBEEF here at sram_base_addr
> + 4, but the cpu itself will be looking at sram_base_addr + 0.
> Again, might be good to somehow document what the protocol is.
>
>> +       dsb_sev();
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * rockchip_smp_prepare_sram - populate necessary sram block
>>    * Starting cores execute the code residing at the start of the on-chip sram
>> @@ -125,7 +147,7 @@ static int __init rockchip_smp_prepare_sram(struct device_node *node)
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> -static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>> +static void __init rk3066_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>>   {
>>          struct device_node *node;
>>          unsigned int i;
>> @@ -194,12 +216,41 @@ static void rockchip_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
>>   }
>>   #endif
>>
>> -static struct smp_operations rockchip_smp_ops __initdata = {
>> -       .smp_prepare_cpus       = rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus,
>> -       .smp_boot_secondary     = rockchip_boot_secondary,
>> +static void __init rk3288_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>> +{
>> +       struct device_node *node;
>> +
>> +       node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "rockchip,rk3066-smp-sram");
>> +       if (!node) {
>> +               pr_err("%s: could not find sram dt node\n", __func__);
>> +               return;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       sram_base_addr = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> +       if (!sram_base_addr) {
>> +               pr_err("%s: could not map pmu registers\n", __func__);
>> +               return;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ncores = 4;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct smp_operations rockchip3066_smp_ops __initdata = {
>> +       .smp_prepare_cpus       = rk3066_smp_prepare_cpus,
>> +       .smp_boot_secondary     = rk3066_boot_secondary,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> +       .cpu_kill               = rockchip_cpu_kill,
>> +       .cpu_die                = rockchip_cpu_die,
>> +#endif
>> +};
>> +CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3066_smp, "rockchip,rk3066-smp", &rockchip3066_smp_ops);
>> +
>> +static struct smp_operations rockchip3288_smp_ops __initdata = {
>> +       .smp_prepare_cpus       = rk3288_smp_prepare_cpus,
>> +       .smp_boot_secondary     = rk3288_boot_secondary,
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>>          .cpu_kill               = rockchip_cpu_kill,
>>          .cpu_die                = rockchip_cpu_die,
>>   #endif
>>   };
>> -CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3066_smp, "rockchip,rk3066-smp", &rockchip_smp_ops);
>> +CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3288_smp, "rockchip,rk3288-smp", &rockchip3288_smp_ops);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
>
>





More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list