[PATCH v5 1/5] phy: add a driver for the Rockchip SoC internal USB2.0 PHY

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:52 +0800, Yunzhi Li wrote:
> On 2014/12/11 14:37, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 11:57 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
[]
> >> So If I have to write something on bit 0, I have to set bit 16.
> >> If I have to write something on bit 1, I have to set bit 17.
> >> If I have to write something on bit 2, I have to set bit 18.
> >> and so on.
> > To me it'd look better to use another << rather than a plus
> Like (BIT(13) << 16)? It looks strange, or could I just use ((1 << 13) 
> << 16) to describe this bit ?

Up to you.  To me, the BIT(x+y) seems odd.