[PATCH 0/9] riscv: ultrarisc: add DP1000 SoC DT and pinctrl support

[Conor Dooley]

On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 05:52:34PM +0800, Jia Wang wrote:
> > Additionally, these pinctrl patches should be sent standalone to the
> > pinctrl maintainers, they're likely to go through lots of revisions and
> > a different maintainer applies them.
> > 
> 
> Just to confirm — for v2, should I completely remove the pinctrl
> binding/driver from this series and send them as a standalone pinctrl
> series, while keeping only the pinctrl references in the DTS?

IMO yes. And cite a link to the pinctrl patches in your cover letter.

Probably you're better off submitting v2 of pinctrl as a higher priority
anyway, since a) the biggest changes are needed there and b) the dts
changes depend on a clock driver/binding being created.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20260521/38f08976/attachment.sig>