[PATCH net-next v7 2/4] net: stmmac: eic7700: enable clocks before syscon access and correct RX sampling timing

[李志]

> -----Original Messages-----
> From: "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba at kernel.org>
> Send time:Wednesday, 13/05/2026 07:13:15
> To: 李志 <lizhi2 at eswincomputing.com>
> Cc: andrew+netdev at lunn.ch, devicetree at vger.kernel.org, davem at davemloft.net, edumazet at google.com, robh at kernel.org, krzk+dt at kernel.org, conor+dt at kernel.org, netdev at vger.kernel.org, pabeni at redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32 at gmail.com, alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com, rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk, pjw at kernel.org, palmer at dabbelt.com, aou at eecs.berkeley.edu, alex at ghiti.fr, linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, maxime.chevallier at bootlin.com, ningyu at eswincomputing.com, linmin at eswincomputing.com, pinkesh.vaghela at einfochips.com, pritesh.patel at einfochips.com, weishangjuan at eswincomputing.com, horms at kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 2/4] net: stmmac: eic7700: enable clocks before syscon access and correct RX sampling timing
> 
> On Tue, 12 May 2026 13:39:12 +0800 (GMT+08:00) 李志 wrote:
> > For the eth1 enablement part, my current understanding is that it
> > should be treated as a new independent v1 series for net-next,
> > since the scope and target tree have changed after the split.
> > 
> > Would you prefer this eth1 series to start as v1, or should it
> > continue as v8 for continuity with the original series?
> 
> v8 is better, but is the fix in net-next already?
> 
> If this is the posting you're referring to:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260507083214.192-1-lizhi2@eswincomputing.com/
> it has been dropped based on feedback from Maxime and I don't see a v2.

Yes, the eth0 fixes have now been reposted as a dedicated series targeting net:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260507083037.152-1-lizhi2@eswincomputing.com/

The previous net-next eth1-related posting was dropped following your guidance
to first complete the eth0 fixes in net before continuing with eth1. I will
keep eth1 as v8 as previously suggested.

For the eth0 net series, I will split the remaining changes in v2 as suggested
by Maxime to improve reviewability and bisectability, and resend shortly.

Once that is completed, I will proceed with the eth1 enablement series (v8)
based on the updated context.

Thanks,
Zhi