[PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: Remove tailcalls tests from DENYLIST.riscv64

[bot+bpf-ci at kernel.org]

> selftests/bpf: Remove tailcalls tests from DENYLIST.riscv64
>
> Remove tailcalls tests from DENYLIST.riscv64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui at huawei.com>

This isn't a bug, but the changelog restates the subject and the diff
without saying why the entry can be dropped now.

The deny-list line being removed documented that the JIT could not mix
bpf2bpf and tailcalls, and the preceding commit "riscv, bpf: Mixing
bpf2bpf and tailcalls" adds that support.

Could the changelog note that the RV64 JIT now supports mixing bpf2bpf
and tailcalls, rather than restating the diff?


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/28384109028