[PATCH 7.1.y 6/6] bpf: Prefer dirty packs for eBPF allocations
Pawan Gupta
pawan.kumar.gupta at linux.intel.com
Thu Jul 9 15:24:47 PDT 2026
commit b72e29e0f7ee329d89f86db8700c8ea99b4a370a upstream.
The pack allocator only flushes predictors when reusing a dirty pack for
cBPF, eBPF allocations never trigger a flush. Currently, eBPF picks the
first free pack, which could be a clean pack. As an optimization, leaving
a clean pack for cBPF can avoid flushes.
Prefer dirty packs for eBPF and keep clean packs free for cBPF. This
mirrors the existing cBPF preference for clean packs: each program kind
prefers the pack that avoids an extra flush, and falls back to the other
kind only when no preferred pack has room. eBPF reuse of a dirty pack is
harmless since eBPF being privileged does not flush.
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta at linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index bba4acd61d41..de61e1894452 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -988,10 +988,10 @@ void *bpf_prog_pack_alloc(u32 size, bpf_jit_fill_hole_t bpf_fill_ill_insns, bool
goto found_free_area;
/*
* cBPF reuse of a dirty pack triggers a flush, so prefer a
- * clean pack for cBPF. eBPF never flushes, so pick the first
- * free pack, dirty or clean.
+ * clean pack for cBPF. eBPF never flushes, so steer it to a
+ * dirty pack and keep clean packs free for cBPF.
*/
- if (!was_classic || !pack->arch_flush_needed)
+ if (was_classic ^ pack->arch_flush_needed)
goto found_free_area;
if (!fallback_pack) {
fallback_pack = pack;
--
2.43.0
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list