[PATCH v2 1/4] regulator: spacemit-p1: Fix n_voltages for BUCK and LDO regulators

[Alex Elder]

On 1/23/26 6:20 PM, Guodong Xu wrote:
> Higher voltage settings were unusable due to incorrect n_voltages values
> causing registration failures. For example, setting aldo4 to 3.3V failed
> with -EINVAL because the required selector (123) exceeded the allowed
> range (n_voltages=117).
> 
> Fix by aligning n_voltages with the hardware register widths per the P1
> datasheet [1]:
> - BUCK: 255 (was 254), allows selectors 0-254, selector 255 is reserved
> - LDO: 128 (was 117), allows selectors 0-127, selectors 0-10 are for
>    suspend mode, valid operational range is 11-127
> 
> This enables the full voltage range supported by the hardware.
> 
> Fixes: 8b84d712ad84 ("regulator: spacemit: support SpacemiT P1 regulators")
> Link: https://developer.spacemit.com/documentation [1]
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong at riscstar.com>
> ---
> v2: No change.
> ---
>   drivers/regulator/spacemit-p1.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/spacemit-p1.c b/drivers/regulator/spacemit-p1.c
> index 2bf9137e12b1..2b585ba01a93 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/spacemit-p1.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/spacemit-p1.c
> @@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ static const struct linear_range p1_ldo_ranges[] = {
>   	}
>   
>   #define P1_BUCK_DESC(_n) \
> -	P1_REG_DESC(BUCK, buck, _n, "vin", 0x47, BUCK_MASK, 254, p1_buck_ranges)
> +	P1_REG_DESC(BUCK, buck, _n, "vin", 0x47, BUCK_MASK, 255, p1_buck_ranges)

This is correct.  There are 255 possible ranges, 0..254, and
255 is an illegal value.

I think this bug is an artifact of a change I made while
chasing an issue during development, and I neglected to
change it back.

Technically this is a bug fix but it doesn't matter because
this voltage value (255 represents 3.450 volts) was not
required.

>   #define P1_ALDO_DESC(_n) \
> -	P1_REG_DESC(ALDO, aldo, _n, "vin", 0x5b, LDO_MASK, 117, p1_ldo_ranges)
> +	P1_REG_DESC(ALDO, aldo, _n, "vin", 0x5b, LDO_MASK, 128, p1_ldo_ranges)

I would say this is not correct.

The valid range of values in this register is 0xd-0x1f (11-127),
which is 117 values; 0xd represents 0.500V and 0x1f represents
3.400V.

Technically, all other values represent 0.5v (and could therefore
be considered valid), but I believe those should never be used
and intentionally considered them invalid.  If 0.5V is desired,
0xd should be used.

Do you disagree with this?
>   #define P1_DLDO_DESC(_n) \
> -	P1_REG_DESC(DLDO, dldo, _n, "buck5", 0x67, LDO_MASK, 117, p1_ldo_ranges)
> +	P1_REG_DESC(DLDO, dldo, _n, "buck5", 0x67, LDO_MASK, 128, p1_ldo_ranges)
>   
>   static const struct regulator_desc p1_regulator_desc[] = {
>   	P1_BUCK_DESC(1),
> 

I have exactly the same comment about this change to the
number of supported values.

					-Alex