[PATCH v4 0/3] Fix bugs and performance of kstack offset randomisation

[Ryan Roberts]

On 20/01/2026 16:37, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 1/20/26 08:32, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> I don't think this question was really addressed to me, but I'll give my opinion
>> anyway; I agree it's pretty binary - it will either work or it will explode.
>> I've tested on arm64 and x86_64 so I have high confidence that it works. If you
>> get it into -next ASAP it has 3 weeks to soak before the merge window opens
>> right? (Linus said he would do an -rc8 this cycle). That feels like enough time
>> to me. But it's your tree 😉
> 
> First of all, thank you for testing it on x86! Having that one data
> point where it helped performance is super valuable.
> 
> I'm more worried that it's going to regress performance somewhere and
> then it's going to be a pain to back out. I'm not super worried about
> functional regressions.

Fair enough. Let's go slow then.