[PATCH] riscv: Implement ARCH_HAS_CC_CAN_LINK

Paul Walmsley pjw at kernel.org
Thu Jan 15 20:50:20 PST 2026


Hi,

On Mon, 22 Dec 2025, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:

> The generic CC_CAN_LINK detection relies on -m32/-m64 compiler flags.
> These are not supported by riscv compilers.
> 
> Use architecture-specific logic using -mabi instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh at linutronix.de>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 6b39f37f769a..b4c1f922eed5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ config RISCV
>  	select ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK if PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
>  	select ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION if TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>  	select ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT
> +	select ARCH_HAS_CC_CAN_LINK
>  	select ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER
>  	select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VIRTUAL if MMU
>  	select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
> @@ -1351,6 +1352,16 @@ config PORTABLE
>  config ARCH_PROC_KCORE_TEXT
>  	def_bool y
>  
> +config ARCH_CC_CAN_LINK
> +	bool
> +	default $(cc_can_link_user,-mabi=lp64d) if 64BIT
> +	default $(cc_can_link_user,-mabi=ilp32d)
> +
> +config ARCH_USERFLAGS
> +	string
> +	default "-mabi=lp64d" if 64BIT
> +	default "-mabi=ilp32d"
> +

Any reason why this patch shouldn't use the non-d ABI variants, as the 
rest of arch/riscv/Kconfig does?  I suspect this may not work for 
!CONFIG_FPU builds.


- Paul


More information about the linux-riscv mailing list