[PATCH 2/5] lib/string_kunit: add test case for strnlen
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at intel.com
Thu Jan 8 02:42:29 PST 2026
On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 06:00:21PM +0800, Feng Jiang wrote:
> On 2026/1/8 15:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 02:53:58PM +0800, Feng Jiang wrote:
> >> On 2026/1/7 19:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 4:35 AM Feng Jiang <jiangfeng at kylinos.cn> wrote:
...
> >>>> Add a KUnit test for strnlen() to verify correctness across
> >>>> different string lengths and memory alignments.
> >>>
> >>> Same comment as per patch 1 (it would probably require to call for
> >>> arch_strnlen() or something like this).
> >>
> >> Thanks, makes sense.
> >>
> >> I'll add the performance benchmarking (random filling + timing) in V2.
> >>
> >> Since string functions are typically exported directly by each architecture
> >> without an arch_ prefix, I'll introduce a generic_strnlen() (based on
> >> lib/string.c) within the test for comparison.
> >
> > Probably you want to make the existing one to have that name and use it inside
> > the test and in the fallback wrapper. We don't want to have duplicate code, it
> > is bad from maintenance perspective.
>
> Thanks for the suggestions!
>
> To avoid code duplication, I'll rename the generic implementation in lib/string.c
> to __generic_strnlen() and keep the original strnlen() as a wrapper. Then I'll use
> the generic one in the KUnit test for comparison.
>
> Does this approach look good to you?
To me, yes. To others, we will know later on when you send a new version.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list