[PATCH V10 2/5] mm: uffd_wp: Add pte_uffd_wp_available()
David Hildenbrand
david at redhat.com
Tue Sep 9 04:43:28 PDT 2025
On 09.09.25 11:56, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> Some platforms can customize the PTE uffd_wp bit and make it unavailable
> even if the architecture allows providing the PTE resource.
> This patch adds a macro API which allows architectures to define
> their specific ones for checking if the PTE uffd_wp bit is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhangchunyan at iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 25 +++++++++--------
> include/asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h | 12 ++++++++
> include/linux/mm_inline.h | 7 +++++
> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> mm/memory.c | 6 ++--
> 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> index 54c6cc7fe9c6..68e5006e5158 100644
> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -1270,9 +1270,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
> if (uffdio_register.mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING)
> vm_flags |= VM_UFFD_MISSING;
> if (uffdio_register.mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP) {
> -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP
> - goto out;
> -#endif
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP) ||
> + !pte_uffd_wp_available())
> + goto out;
> +
Same comment as for the other patch: make the
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP part of the pte_uffd_wp_available()
check and better call it "pgtable_uffd_wp_" ... available/supported.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list