[PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: display: add verisilicon,dc
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Wed Nov 26 02:22:45 PST 2025
On 26/11/2025 10:50, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Icenowy Zheng <uwu at icenowy.me>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + $nodename:
>>> + pattern: "^display@[0-9a-f]+$"
>>> +
>>> + compatible:
>>> + items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - thead,th1520-dc8200
>>> + - const: verisilicon,dc
>>
>> I do not see any explanation of exception for generic compatibles,
>> maybe
>> except "self-identification" remark. Rob already pointed this out, so
>> be
>> explicit in commit msg why you are using a generic compatible.
>
> Well I only get the meaning of "a SoC specific compatible is required"
> in his review message.
>
> I think my binding now requires both a SoC-specific compatible and a
> generic compatible, which should be okay to satisfy Rob's original
> review.
You will get then the same questions for me - what justifies generic
compatible. You should be on this explicit, because otherwise people
misinterpret some commits and patches, and they think the generic
compatible is allowed for them as well.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + clocks:
>>> + minItems: 4
>>
>> This is not flexible. Device either has or has not these clocks.
>
> The existence of all these clocks are verified by diagrams in manuals
So not flexible, then:
> of two different SoCs with DC8200 (T-Head TH1520 and StarFive JH7110).
>
> Maybe a explicit `maxItems: 5` is needed here, but as my DT passes
> dtbs_check, I don't think it's necessary?
No, drop minItems only.
>
> Or maybe I should drop the flexibility now and use a `minItems: 5` here
> (and leave DC8000 support as another story)? (The Eswin EIC7700 manual
> does not have a diagram showing external connections of the DC, like
> the two SoCs I mentioned above).
You document here only the devices explicitly mentioned in the binding.
You cannot add here constraints or clocks for some device which is not
in the binding and I see only th1520 in the binding.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list