[PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: display: add verisilicon,dc
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Mon Nov 24 09:40:55 PST 2025
On 24/11/2025 16:25, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2025-11-24星期一的 13:31 +0100,Krzysztof Kozlowski写道:
>> On 24/11/2025 13:20, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 01:08:00PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 24/11/2025 13:05, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't really get what the fuss is with the dual signoff,
>>>>> what's the
>>>>> point having both when they represent the same person? Pretty
>>>>> sure it
>>>>> was you (Krzysztof) and Arnd that told me not to both doing the
>>>>> double
>>>>> signoff.
>>>>
>>>> I do not object having or not having dual signed off HERE.
>>>>
>>>> I never said that. Just like I never said "From" has to be
>>>> changed.
>>>
>>> I didn't say you objected to both being there. *I* am saying that
>>> it is
>>
>> Ah, sure. Yes, if both identities work I would propose to skip second
>> SoB. But I also stopped objecting of having two identities listed, as
>> long as they are correct.
>
> Well it's unfortunate that some policy now requires me to list the
> second identity.
No policy asked you...
>
> Should I resend the whole patchset with the ISCAS mail?
You can, it probably would solve the issue, unless you change the
author, but why you cannot do what I asked at the beginning - set
correct order of SoBs, so the @icenowy.me being the last?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list