[PATCH] riscv: Update MIPS vendor id to 0x127.

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 04:05:48PM +0100, Aleksa Paunovic wrote:
> From: Chao-ying Fu <cfu at wavecomp.com>
> 
> [1] defines MIPS vendor id as 0x127.
> 
> [1] https://mips.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/P8700_Programmers_Reference_Manual_Rev1.84_5-31-2025.pdf
> 
> Fixes: a8fed1bc03ace27902338e4f0d318335883ac847 ("riscv: Add xmipsexectl as a vendor extension")

Incorrect format for fixes tags!

> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Paunovic <aleksa.paunovic at htecgroup.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h
> index 3b09874d7a6dfb8f8aa45b0be41c20711d539e78..55205f7938055ba2b744dba5118bba935bcac008 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vendorid_list.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,6 @@
>  #define MICROCHIP_VENDOR_ID	0x029
>  #define SIFIVE_VENDOR_ID	0x489
>  #define THEAD_VENDOR_ID		0x5b7
> -#define MIPS_VENDOR_ID		0x722
> +#define MIPS_VENDOR_ID		0x127

How was this ever wrong? Do devices exist with this old ID? Do we need
to support both as vendor IDs for MIPS?
Also, this was added in the wrong point in the list (it's meant to be
alphanumeric order IIRC). Sorting by the ID makes things annoying to
humans to read.

>  
>  #endif
> 
> ---
> base-commit: dcb6fa37fd7bc9c3d2b066329b0d27dedf8becaa
> change-id: 20251031-mips-vendorid-df103aedf117
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Aleksa Paunovic <aleksa.paunovic at htecgroup.com>
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20251103/4bfd6fd5/attachment.sig>