[PATCH v3 18/23] ACPI: RISC-V: Add support to update gsi range
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Mon May 12 00:31:05 PDT 2025
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 07:09:34PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> From: Sunil V L <sunilvl at ventanamicro.com>
>
> Some RISC-V interrupt controllers like RPMI based system MSI interrupt
> controllers do not have MADT entry defined. These interrupt controllers
> exist only in the namespace. ACPI spec defines _GSB method to get the
> GSI base of the interrupt controller, However, there is no such standard
> method to get the GSI range. To support such interrupt controllers, set
> the GSI range of such interrupt controllers to non-overlapping range and
> provide API for interrupt controller driver to update it with proper
> value.
...
> +static inline int riscv_acpi_update_gsi_range(u32 gsi_base, u32 nr_irqs)
> +{
> + return -1;
Why not using the defined error code?
> +}
...
> +int riscv_acpi_update_gsi_range(u32 gsi_base, u32 nr_irqs)
> +{
> + struct riscv_ext_intc_list *ext_intc_element;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(ext_intc_element, &ext_intc_list, list) {
> + if (gsi_base == ext_intc_element->gsi_base &&
> + (ext_intc_element->flag & RISCV_ACPI_INTC_FLAG_PENDING)) {
> + ext_intc_element->nr_irqs = nr_irqs;
> + ext_intc_element->flag &= ~RISCV_ACPI_INTC_FLAG_PENDING;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> + return -1;
Ditto.
> +}
...
> + /* If nr_irqs is zero, indicate it in flag and set to max range possible */
> + if (!nr_irqs) {
Make conditional positive.
> + ext_intc_element->flag |= RISCV_ACPI_INTC_FLAG_PENDING;
> + ext_intc_element->nr_irqs = U32_MAX - ext_intc_element->gsi_base;
One space too many.
> + } else {
> + ext_intc_element->nr_irqs = nr_irqs;
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list