[PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] selftests/bpf: Verify zero-extension behavior in load-acquire tests

[Peilin Ye]

Verify that 8-, 16- and 32-bit load-acquires are zero-extending by using
immediate values with their highest bit set.  Do the same for the 64-bit
variant to keep the style consistent.

Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn at kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui at huawei.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn at rivosinc.com> # QEMU/RVA23
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin at google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
index a696ab84bfd6..74f4f19c10b8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ __naked void load_acquire_8(void)
 {
 	asm volatile (
 	"r0 = 0;"
-	"w1 = 0x12;"
+	"w1 = 0xfe;"
 	"*(u8 *)(r10 - 1) = w1;"
 	".8byte %[load_acquire_insn];" // w2 = load_acquire((u8 *)(r10 - 1));
 	"if r2 == r1 goto 1f;"
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ __naked void load_acquire_16(void)
 {
 	asm volatile (
 	"r0 = 0;"
-	"w1 = 0x1234;"
+	"w1 = 0xfedc;"
 	"*(u16 *)(r10 - 2) = w1;"
 	".8byte %[load_acquire_insn];" // w2 = load_acquire((u16 *)(r10 - 2));
 	"if r2 == r1 goto 1f;"
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ __naked void load_acquire_32(void)
 {
 	asm volatile (
 	"r0 = 0;"
-	"w1 = 0x12345678;"
+	"w1 = 0xfedcba09;"
 	"*(u32 *)(r10 - 4) = w1;"
 	".8byte %[load_acquire_insn];" // w2 = load_acquire((u32 *)(r10 - 4));
 	"if r2 == r1 goto 1f;"
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ __naked void load_acquire_64(void)
 {
 	asm volatile (
 	"r0 = 0;"
-	"r1 = 0x1234567890abcdef ll;"
+	"r1 = 0xfedcba0987654321 ll;"
 	"*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
 	".8byte %[load_acquire_insn];" // r2 = load_acquire((u64 *)(r10 - 8));
 	"if r2 == r1 goto 1f;"
-- 
2.49.0.967.g6a0df3ecc3-goog