[PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf/verifier: Handle BPF_LOAD_ACQ instructions in insn_def_regno()
Pu Lehui
pulehui at huawei.com
Tue May 6 07:03:59 PDT 2025
On 2025/4/30 8:50, Peilin Ye wrote:
> In preparation for supporting BPF load-acquire and store-release
> instructions for architectures where bpf_jit_needs_zext() returns true
> (e.g. riscv64), make insn_def_regno() handle load-acquires properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin at google.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 54c6953a8b84..6435ea23fee4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -3649,13 +3649,16 @@ static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
> case BPF_ST:
> return -1;
> case BPF_STX:
> - if ((BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC ||
> - BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC) &&
> - (insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)) {
> + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC ||
> + BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC) {
> if (insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG)
> return BPF_REG_0;
> - else
> + else if (insn->imm == BPF_LOAD_ACQ)
> + return insn->dst_reg;
> + else if (insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)
> return insn->src_reg;
> + else
> + return -1;
> } else {
> return -1;
> }
How about simplify like this:
```
static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
switch (BPF_CLASS(insn->code)) {
case BPF_JMP:
case BPF_JMP32:
case BPF_ST:
return -1;
case BPF_STX:
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC ||
BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC) {
if (insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG)
return BPF_REG_0;
else if (insn->imm == BPF_LOAD_ACQ)
return insn->dst_reg;
else if (insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)
return insn->src_reg;
}
return -1;
default:
return insn->dst_reg;
}
}
```
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list