[PATCH v4] riscv: hwprobe: Fix stale vDSO data for late-initialized keys at boot
Jingwei Wang
wangjingwei at iscas.ac.cn
Fri Jun 27 10:27:42 PDT 2025
The value for some hwprobe keys, like MISALIGNED_VECTOR_PERF, is
determined by an asynchronous kthread. This kthread can finish after
the hwprobe vDSO data is populated, creating a race condition where
userspace can read stale values.
A completion-based framework is introduced to synchronize the async
probes with the vDSO population. The init_hwprobe_vdso_data()
function is deferred to `late_initcall` and now blocks until all
probes signal completion.
Reported-by: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio at irq.a4lg.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/760d637b-b13b-4518-b6bf-883d55d44e7f@irq.a4lg.com/
Fixes: e7c9d66e313b ("RISC-V: Report vector unaligned access speed hwprobe")
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti at rivosinc.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jingwei Wang <wangjingwei at iscas.ac.cn>
---
Changes in v4:
- Reworked the synchronization mechanism based on feedback from Palmer
and Alexandre.
- Instead of a post-hoc refresh, this version introduces a robust
completion-based framework using an atomic counter to ensure async
probes are finished before populating the vDSO.
- Moved the vdso data initialization to a late_initcall to avoid
impacting boot time.
Changes in v3:
- Retained existing blank line.
Changes in v2:
- Addressed feedback from Yixun's regarding #ifdef CONFIG_MMU usage.
- Updated commit message to provide a high-level summary.
- Added Fixes tag for commit e7c9d66e313b.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20250521052754.185231-1-wangjingwei@iscas.ac.cn/T/#u
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 8 +++++++-
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 9 +++++++--
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
index 7fe0a379474ae2c6..87af186d92e75ddb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -40,5 +40,11 @@ static inline bool riscv_hwprobe_pair_cmp(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
return pair->value == other_pair->value;
}
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
+void riscv_hwprobe_register_async_probe(void);
+void riscv_hwprobe_complete_async_probe(void);
+#else
+inline void riscv_hwprobe_register_async_probe(void) {}
+inline void riscv_hwprobe_complete_async_probe(void) {}
+#endif
#endif
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
index 0b170e18a2beba57..8c50dcec2b754c30 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
* more details.
*/
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
@@ -467,6 +469,20 @@ static int do_riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe __user *pairs,
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
+static DECLARE_COMPLETION(boot_probes_done);
+static atomic_t pending_boot_probes = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+
+void riscv_hwprobe_register_async_probe(void)
+{
+ atomic_inc(&pending_boot_probes);
+}
+
+void riscv_hwprobe_complete_async_probe(void)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pending_boot_probes))
+ complete(&boot_probes_done);
+}
+
static int __init init_hwprobe_vdso_data(void)
{
struct vdso_arch_data *avd = vdso_k_arch_data;
@@ -474,6 +490,8 @@ static int __init init_hwprobe_vdso_data(void)
struct riscv_hwprobe pair;
int key;
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&pending_boot_probes) > 0))
+ wait_for_completion(&boot_probes_done);
/*
* Initialize vDSO data with the answers for the "all CPUs" case, to
* save a syscall in the common case.
@@ -504,7 +522,7 @@ static int __init init_hwprobe_vdso_data(void)
return 0;
}
-arch_initcall_sync(init_hwprobe_vdso_data);
+late_initcall(init_hwprobe_vdso_data);
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
index ae2068425fbcd207..4b8ad2673b0f7470 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
@@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static void check_vector_unaligned_access(struct work_struct *work __always_unus
static int __init vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void *unused __always_unused)
{
schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access);
+ riscv_hwprobe_complete_async_probe();
return 0;
}
@@ -473,8 +474,12 @@ static int __init check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) = unaligned_vector_speed_param;
} else if (!check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus() &&
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) {
- kthread_run(vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus,
- NULL, "vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus");
+ riscv_hwprobe_register_async_probe();
+ if (IS_ERR(kthread_run(vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus,
+ NULL, "vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus"))) {
+ pr_warn("Failed to create vec_unalign_check kthread\n");
+ riscv_hwprobe_complete_async_probe();
+ }
}
/*
--
2.50.0
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list