[PATCH v2 0/2] RISC-V: turn sbi_ecall into a variadic macro
David Laight
david.laight.linux at gmail.com
Tue Jun 24 01:09:23 PDT 2025
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:03:12 PDT (-0700), rkrcmar at ventanamicro.com wrote:
> > v2 has a completely rewritten [1/2], and fixes some missed trailing
> > zeroes in [2/2]. The fixes in [2/2] are important for v2, because
> > sbi_ecall doesn't fill the registers with zeroes anymore.
>
> The SBI spec says "Registers that are not defined in the SBI function
> call are not reserved." and I'm not really sure what to make of that.
> Specifically: does that mean implementations are allowed to ascribe
> custom meaning to those parameters and might start doing stuff if
> they're not set to zero?
Or does it mean they aren't guaranteed to be preserved?
David
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list