[PATCH 0/5] remove tlb_remove_page_ptdesc()
Qi Zheng
zhengqi.arch at bytedance.com
Fri Jan 24 05:04:02 PST 2025
On 2025/1/24 19:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:26:13PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As suggested by Peter Zijlstra below [1], this series aims to remove
>> tlb_remove_page_ptdesc().
>>
>> : Fundamentally tlb_remove_page() is about removing *pages* as from a PTE,
>> : there should not be a page-table anywhere near here *ever*.
>> :
>> : Yes, some architectures use tlb_remove_page() for page-tables too, but
>> : that is more or less an implementation detail that can be fixed.
>>
>> After this series, all architectures use tlb_remove_table() or tlb_remove_ptdesc()
>> to remove the page table pages. In the future, once all architectures using
>> tlb_remove_table() have also converted to using struct ptdesc (eg. powerpc), it
>> may be possible to use only tlb_remove_ptdesc().
>
> Right, so I don't think Sparc and Power care to use ptdesc, they're
> using non page page-tables.
>
> At the very least we should do something like this, the only point of
> having tlb_remove_ptdesc() is type safety, there really is no benefit
> from it in any other way.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> index dec030cb1210..a6731328db6f 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_page(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *page)
> return tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, PAGE_SIZE);
> }
>
> -static inline void tlb_remove_ptdesc(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *pt)
> +static inline void tlb_remove_ptdesc(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct ptdesc *pt)
> {
> tlb_remove_table(tlb, pt);
> }
Ah, make sense. I think this can be added to the patch #1.
Thanks!
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list