[PATCH v5 0/3] Enable Zicbom in usermode
Alexandre Ghiti
alexghiti at rivosinc.com
Tue Feb 25 05:21:17 PST 2025
Hi Yunhui,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 3:40 AM Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui at bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> v1/v2:
> There is only the first patch: RISC-V: Enable cbo.clean/flush in usermode,
> which mainly removes the enabling of cbo.inval in user mode.
>
> v3:
> Add the functionality of Expose Zicbom and selftests for Zicbom.
>
> v4:
> Modify the order of macros, The test_no_cbo_inval function is added
> separately.
>
> v5:
> 1. Modify the order of RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOM_BLOCK_SIZE in hwprobe.rst
> 2. "TEST_NO_ZICBOINVAL" -> "TEST_NO_CBO_INVAL"
>
> Yunhui Cui (3):
> RISC-V: Enable cbo.clean/flush in usermode
> RISC-V: hwprobe: Expose Zicbom extension and its block size
> RISC-V: selftests: Add TEST_ZICBOM into CBO tests
>
> Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 6 ++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 8 +++
> arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 6 ++
> tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++----
> 6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
So a v6 needs to be sent with:
- the fix for hwprobe_ext0_has() reported by kernel test robot
- a rebase on top of 6.14 since patch 2 will conflict with
RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_VENDOR_EXT_THEAD_0
Do you think you can do that soon so that it gets merged in 6.15? The
patchset received a lot of RB so it would be too bad to miss this
release.
Thanks,
Alex
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list