[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: reset: add generic bit reset controller
Inochi Amaoto
inochiama at gmail.com
Thu Feb 13 03:18:03 PST 2025
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:22:07AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Do, 2025-02-13 at 10:35 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:08:54AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > > Some SoCs from Aspeed, Allwinner, Sophgo and Synopsys have
> > > a simple reset controller by toggling bit. It is a hard time
> > > for each device to add its own compatible to the driver.
> > > Since this device share a common design, it is possible to
> > > add a common device to reduce these unnecessary change.
> >
> > SoC components are rarely that simple and even if it is just a bit,
> > usually it is part of one or few registers.
>
> Yes, in those cases (which are probably most of them), I would argue
> this binding doesn't really fit.
>
Yes, I agree.
> > Anyway, there are already bindings for reset-simple and I do not
> > understand why this has to be duplicated.
>
> I think the motivation is to not have to add a new binding document and
> modify reset-simple.c every time there is a new SoC.
Yeah, this is the motivation for me to write this patch. It seems that I
describe it in a wrong way.
> I wonder if some of this can be mitigated by adding just the
> binding document similar to trivial-devices.yaml, without the
> actual "reset-simple" compatible.
>
It is better to keep the original compatible. Adding new base compatible
will break existing device and make the migration hard.
Regards,
Inochi
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list