[PATCH v7 2/3] pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Chen,

I was tempted to apply this patch while reading throug it until nearly
the end ...

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 03:01:13PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> [...]
> +static int pwm_sg2042_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> [...]
> +	rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared_deasserted(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rst))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rst), "Failed to get reset\n");
> +
> +	chip->ops = &pwm_sg2042_ops;
> +	chip->atomic = true;
> +
> +	ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		reset_control_assert(rst);

This is wrong (well, or unneeded). With
devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared_deasserted() the devm cleanup
cares for reasserting the reset.

> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register PWM chip\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

If you want I can apply and squash the following in:

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
index ce8cf8af3402..ff4639d849ce 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
@@ -174,10 +174,8 @@ static int pwm_sg2042_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	chip->atomic = true;
 
 	ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		reset_control_assert(rst);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register PWM chip\n");
-	}
 
 	return 0;
 }

ack?

Best regards
Uwe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20250205/d339721d/attachment.sig>