[PATCH v1 17/36] mm/pagewalk: drop nth_page() usage within folio in folio_walk_start()
Lorenzo Stoakes
lorenzo.stoakes at oracle.com
Thu Aug 28 09:21:30 PDT 2025
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:21AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> It's no longer required to use nth_page() within a folio, so let's just
> drop the nth_page() in folio_walk_start().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes at oracle.com>
> ---
> mm/pagewalk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
> index c6753d370ff4e..9e4225e5fcf5c 100644
> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
> @@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ struct folio *folio_walk_start(struct folio_walk *fw,
> found:
> if (expose_page)
> /* Note: Offset from the mapped page, not the folio start. */
> - fw->page = nth_page(page, (addr & (entry_size - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + fw->page = page + ((addr & (entry_size - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
Be nice to clean this horrid one liner up a bit also but that's out of
scope here :)
> else
> fw->page = NULL;
> fw->ptl = ptl;
> --
> 2.50.1
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list