[PATCH v2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Respect mask state when setting affinity

[Chen Wang]

Hi, Thomas, will you merge this? I see you have picked another related 
patchset [1].

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250813232835.43458-1-inochiama@gmail.com/ 
[1].

Thanks,

Chen

On 8/11/2025 8:26 AM, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> The plic_set_affinity always call plic_irq_enable(), which clears up
> the priority setting even the irq is only masked. This make the irq
> unmasked unexpectly.
>
> Replace the plic_irq_enable/disable() with plic_irq_toggle() to
> avoid changing priority setting.
>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama at gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao at linutronix.de>
> Tested-by: Nam Cao <namcao at linutronix.de> # VisionFive 2
> ---
> Change from v1:
> 1. apply Nam's tag
> 2. remove unnecessary off-topic change in plic_irq_disable()
> ---
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 6 ++++--
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> index bf69a4802b71..866e38612b94 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -179,12 +179,14 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
>   	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>
> -	plic_irq_disable(d);
> +	/* Invalidate the original routing entry */
> +	plic_irq_toggle(irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(d), d, 0);
>
>   	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
>
> +	/* Setting the new routing entry if irq is enabled */
>   	if (!irqd_irq_disabled(d))
> -		plic_irq_enable(d);
> +		plic_irq_toggle(irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(d), d, 1);
>
>   	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
>   }
> --
> 2.50.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv