[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: reset: Scope the compatible to VO subsystem explicitly
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Fri Aug 22 02:45:00 PDT 2025
On 22/08/2025 10:28, Yao Zi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 09:54:08AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 07:42:43AM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
>>> The reset controller driver for the TH1520 was using the generic
>>> compatible string "thead,th1520-reset". However, the controller
>>> described by this compatible only manages the resets for the Video
>>> Output (VO) subsystem.
>>
>> Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
>> example with 'git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE' on the directory
>> your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
>> explained here:
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters
>
> Thanks for your review, I appreciate it and will stick to
> thead,th1520-reset for the VO reset controller.
>
> But I'm not very clear about the subject prefix: I already have a
> "dt-bindings: reset: " prefix, should I also make the subject more
> precise, including the exact file changed when changing a binding file?
Yes, as you can check in other commits. Your subject claims that you
change " Scope the compatible to VO subsystem explicitly" for all reset
controllers.
>
> I've seen commits either with or without the precise name of the changed
> binding in subjects. For example,
>
> a341bcfbfa7 dt-bindings: reset: add compatible for bcm63xx ephy control
But it says bcm63xx at least. Well, you will find plenty of poor
examples as well. I gave you template response because you made typical
mistake.
Anyway, you ignored rest of my response, so I assume you agree with it
completely.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list