[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: starfive,jh7110: add PAD_INTERNAL_* virtual pins

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 28/04/2025 10:40, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2025-04-28星期一的 09:20 +0200，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道：
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 02:20:15PM GMT, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>> The JH7110 SoC could support internal GPI signals to be routed to
>>> not
>>> external GPIO but internal low/high levels.
>>>
>>> Add two macros, PAD_INTERNAL_LOW and PAD_INTERNAL_HIGH, as two
>>> virtual
>>> "pads" to represent internal GPI sources with fixed low/high
>>> levels.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu at icenowy.me>
>>> ---
>>>  include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/starfive,jh7110-pinctrl.h | 4 ++++
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/starfive,jh7110-pinctrl.h
>>> b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/starfive,jh7110-pinctrl.h
>>> index 3865f01396395..3cca874b2bef7 100644
>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/starfive,jh7110-pinctrl.h
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/starfive,jh7110-pinctrl.h
>>> @@ -126,6 +126,10 @@
>>>  #define        PAD_GMAC0_TXEN          18
>>>  #define        PAD_GMAC0_TXC           19
>>>  
>>> +/* virtual pins for forcing GPI */
>>> +#define PAD_INTERNAL_LOW       254
>>> +#define PAD_INTERNAL_HIGH      255
>>
>> Why this cannot be 20 and 21? These are not values for registers, but
>> abstract numbers.
> 
> The number must not collide with SYS GPIO pads too.

There are no SYS GPIO pads here. Do you understand that this is not
value for registers?

Best regards,
Krzysztof