[linux][PATCH v2 06/20] dt-bindings: cache: sifive,ccache0: add a PIC64GX compatible

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:54:35AM +0100, pierre-henry.moussay at microchip.com wrote:
> From: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay at microchip.com>
> 
> The PIC64GX use the same IP than MPFS, therefore add compatibility with
> MPFS as fallback
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay at microchip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml
> index 7e8cebe21584..9d064feb2ab1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ properties:
>            - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
>            - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>            - const: cache
> +      - items:
> +          - const: microchip,pic64gx-ccache
> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
> +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> +          - const: cache
>  
>    cache-block-size:
>      const: 64
> @@ -93,6 +98,7 @@ allOf:
>                - starfive,jh7100-ccache
>                - starfive,jh7110-ccache
>                - microchip,mpfs-ccache
> +              - microchip,pic64gx-ccache

Is this required? Shouldn't the fallback activate it?

>  
>      then:
>        properties:
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20240930/0ab0f326/attachment.sig>