[RESEND PATCH 3/3] riscv: dts: canaan: Add k230's pinctrl node

Ze Huang 18771902331 at 163.com
Mon Sep 23 02:56:31 PDT 2024


On 9/23/24 5:50 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 04:39:29PM +0800, Ze Huang wrote:
>> On 9/16/24 11:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 16/09/2024 08:47, Ze Huang wrote:
>>>> Add pinctrl device, containing default config for uart, pwm, iis, iic and
>>>> mmc.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ze Huang <18771902331 at 163.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi | 316 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.h    |  18 ++
>>>>    arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230.dtsi         |   2 +
>>>>    3 files changed, 336 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>    create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..0737f50d2868
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Ze Huang <18771902331 at 163.com>
>>>> + */
>>>> +#include "k230-pinctrl.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +/ {
>>>> +	soc {
>>>> +		pinctrl: pinctrl at 91105000 {
>>> That's odd style - defining SoC nodes outside of SoC DTSI. Are you sure
>>> that's preferred coding style in RISC-V or Canaan?
>> Pinctrl-related nodes were separated the for ease of maintenance, but the
>> convention in Canaan is to place them in the board-level DTS file. Would it
>> be better to stay consistent with their approach?
> Yeah, please put them in the board-level file.

OK

>
> Thanks,
> Conor.




More information about the linux-riscv mailing list