[PATCH 1/1] target/riscv: enable floating point unit
Peter Maydell
peter.maydell at linaro.org
Wed Sep 18 08:32:31 PDT 2024
On Wed, 18 Sept 2024 at 14:49, Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 18.09.24 15:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Sept 2024 at 14:06, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
> >> Thanks Peter for looking into this.
> >>
> >> QEMU's cpu_synchronize_all_post_init() and
> >> do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_reset() both end up in
> >> kvm_arch_put_registers() and that is long after Linux
> >> kvm_arch_vcpu_create() has been setting some FPU state. See the output
> >> below.
> >>
> >> kvm_arch_put_registers() copies the CSRs by calling
> >> kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(). Here we can find:
> >>
> >> KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sstatus, env->mstatus);
> >>
> >> This call enables or disables the FPU according to the value of
> >> env->mstatus.
> >>
> >> So we need to set the desired state of the floating point unit in QEMU.
> >> And this is what the current patch does both for TCG and KVM.
> >
> > If it does this for both TCG and KVM then I don't understand
> > this bit from the commit message:
> >
> > # Without this patch EDK II with TLS enabled crashes when hitting the first
> > # floating point instruction while running QEMU with --accel kvm and runs
> > # fine with --accel tcg.
> >
> > Shouldn't this guest crash the same way with both KVM and TCG without
> > this patch, because the FPU state is the same for both?
> By default `qemu-system-riscv64 --accel tcg` runs OpenSBI as firmware
> which enables the FPU.
>
> If you would choose a different SBI implementation which does not enable
> the FPU you could experience the same crash.
Ah, so KVM vs TCG is a red herring and it's actually "some guest
firmware doesn't enable the FPU itself, and if you run that then it will
fall over, whether you do it in KVM or TCG" ? That makes more sense.
I don't have an opinion on whether you want to do that or not,
not knowing what the riscv architecture mandates. (On Arm this
would be fairly clearly "the guest software is broken and
should be fixed", but that's because the Arm architecture
says you can't assume the FPU is enabled from reset.)
I do think the commit message could use clarification to
explain this.
thanks
-- PMM
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list