Is RISC-V Static Call worth implementing ?

[Conor Dooley]

On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 03:05:33AM -0500, Juhan Jin wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I’m interested in implementing Static Call for RISC-V, and I want to
> know whether it is worth the efforts to implement Static Call for
> RISC-V.
> 
> Does the aforementioned benefits merit a RISC-V static call implementation 
> (especially inline)? Or are the benefits so negligible that it’s simply not 
> worth the effort to do a RISC-V implementation?

Pretty sure we've talked about wanting it before - Samuel, Alex, Drew
Jones or Palmer might remember best what exactly we wanted it for
however, as I do not.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20240913/0d4a3dba/attachment.sig>