[PATCH v5 0/2] riscv: sophgo: Add pinctrl support for CV1800 series SoC

[Conor Dooley]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 06:24:34AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:41:10PM GMT, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 06:38:40AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > > Add basic pinctrl driver for Sophgo CV1800 series SoCs.
> > > This patch series aims to replace the previous patch from Jisheng [1].
> > > Since the pinctrl of cv1800 has nested mux and its pin definination
> > > is discrete, it is not suitable to use "pinctrl-single" to cover the
> > > pinctrl device.
> > > 
> > > This patch require another patch [2] that provides standard attribute
> > > "input-schmitt-microvolt"
> > > 
> > > The v4 version is from [3]
> > 
> > Which version of this ended up in linux-next? I see a link to v4 in
> > what's been applied, but this v5 was sent before that code was
> > committed.
> > 
> > Either way, what's been applied and what's here produce warnings:
> > cv1812h.dtsi:19.28-24.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl at 3008000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "3001000"
> > cv1800b.dtsi:18.28-23.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl at 3008000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "3001000"
> > 
> > It's just a copy-paste error I would imagine, but please send a fix.
> 
> Yes, it is like some copy-paste error, I will fix it.

I'd rather you had sent some follow-up patches, than rebase your tree at
this point in the cycle. I assume you hadn't yet sent that stuff in a PR
to Arnd?

Cheers,
Conor.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20240910/a114775c/attachment.sig>