[PATCH bpf-next v3 02/10] selftests/bpf: Rename fallback in bpf_dctcp to avoid naming conflict

[Pu Lehui]

From: Pu Lehui <pulehui at huawei.com>

Recently, when compiling bpf selftests on RV64, the following
compilation failure occurred:

progs/bpf_dctcp.c:29:21: error: redefinition of 'fallback' as different kind of symbol
   29 | volatile const char fallback[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
      |                     ^
/workspace/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/vmlinux.h:86812:15: note: previous definition is here
 86812 | typedef u32 (*fallback)(u32, const unsigned char *, size_t);

The reason is that the `fallback` symbol has been defined in
arch/riscv/lib/crc32.c, which will cause symbol conflicts when vmlinux.h
is included in bpf_dctcp. Let we rename `fallback` string to
`fallback_cc` in bpf_dctcp to fix this compilation failure.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui at huawei.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_dctcp.c       | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 1d494b4453f4..409a06975823 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static void test_dctcp_fallback(void)
 	dctcp_skel = bpf_dctcp__open();
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(dctcp_skel, "dctcp_skel"))
 		return;
-	strcpy(dctcp_skel->rodata->fallback, "cubic");
+	strcpy(dctcp_skel->rodata->fallback_cc, "cubic");
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(bpf_dctcp__load(dctcp_skel), "bpf_dctcp__load"))
 		goto done;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_dctcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_dctcp.c
index 02f552e7fd4d..7cd73e75f52a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_dctcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_dctcp.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static bool before(__u32 seq1, __u32 seq2)
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
-volatile const char fallback[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
+volatile const char fallback_cc[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
 const char bpf_dctcp[] = "bpf_dctcp";
 const char tcp_cdg[] = "cdg";
 char cc_res[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
@@ -71,10 +71,10 @@ void BPF_PROG(bpf_dctcp_init, struct sock *sk)
 	struct bpf_dctcp *ca = inet_csk_ca(sk);
 	int *stg;
 
-	if (!(tp->ecn_flags & TCP_ECN_OK) && fallback[0]) {
+	if (!(tp->ecn_flags & TCP_ECN_OK) && fallback_cc[0]) {
 		/* Switch to fallback */
 		if (bpf_setsockopt(sk, SOL_TCP, TCP_CONGESTION,
-				   (void *)fallback, sizeof(fallback)) == -EBUSY)
+				   (void *)fallback_cc, sizeof(fallback_cc)) == -EBUSY)
 			ebusy_cnt++;
 
 		/* Switch back to myself and the recurred bpf_dctcp_init()
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ void BPF_PROG(bpf_dctcp_init, struct sock *sk)
 
 		/* Switch back to fallback */
 		if (bpf_setsockopt(sk, SOL_TCP, TCP_CONGESTION,
-				   (void *)fallback, sizeof(fallback)) == -EBUSY)
+				   (void *)fallback_cc, sizeof(fallback_cc)) == -EBUSY)
 			ebusy_cnt++;
 
 		/* Expecting -ENOTSUPP for tcp_cdg_res */
-- 
2.34.1