[PATCH v13 34/85] KVM: Get writable mapping for __kvm_vcpu_map() only when necessary
Yan Zhao
yan.y.zhao at intel.com
Mon Oct 21 02:25:40 PDT 2024
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:23:36AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> When creating a memory map for read, don't request a writable pfn from the
> primary MMU. While creating read-only mappings can be theoretically slower,
> as they don't play nice with fast GUP due to the need to break CoW before
> mapping the underlying PFN, practically speaking, creating a mapping isn't
> a super hot path, and getting a writable mapping for reading is weird and
> confusing.
>
> Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc at google.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 080740f65061..b845e9252633 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -3122,7 +3122,7 @@ int __kvm_vcpu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_host_map *map,
> struct kvm_follow_pfn kfp = {
> .slot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gfn),
> .gfn = gfn,
> - .flags = FOLL_WRITE,
> + .flags = writable ? FOLL_WRITE : 0,
> .refcounted_page = &map->pinned_page,
> .pin = true,
> };
When writable is false, could we set ".pin = false," ?
Also not sure if ".map_writable = NULL" is missing.
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list