[PATCH 3/3] riscv: add PREEMPT_LAZY support

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 06:05:30 PDT (-0700), bigeasy at linutronix.de wrote:
> On 2024-10-09 15:03:07 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> > index 9c10fb180f438..8b5a5ddea4293 100644
>> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> > @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src);
>> >   * - pending work-to-be-done flags are in lowest half-word
>> >   * - other flags in upper half-word(s)
>> >   */
>> > +#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY	0       /* Lazy rescheduling needed */
>> >  #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	1	/* callback before returning to user */
>> >  #define TIF_SIGPENDING		2	/* signal pending */
>> >  #define TIF_NEED_RESCHED	3	/* rescheduling necessary */
>>
>> So for x86 I shuffled the flags around to have the two NEED_RESCHED ones
>> side-by-side. Not strictly required ofcourse, but...
>
> I can shuffle them. I don't think the riscv camp will complain (saying
> this for them to actual complain if so).

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>