回复: [v3] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110: Add camera subsystem nodes

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:27:41PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2024-10-14 01:08, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> > Hi, Aurelien
> > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 2024-02-18 19:27, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> > > > Add camera subsystem nodes for the StarFive JH7110 SoC. They contain
> > > > the dphy-rx, csi2rx, camss nodes.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang at starfivetech.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi         | 49 ++++++++++++++
> > > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi      | 67
> > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > We have been asked to enable CONFIG_VIDEO_STARFIVE_CAMSS in the
> > > Debian kernel, which from my understanding and given the device tree shown
> > > below also requires enabling CONFIG_VIDEO_CADENCE_CSI2RX. That said
> > > doing so triggers the following error in dmesg:
> > > 
> > > [   25.143282] cdns-csi2rx 19800000.csi: probe with driver cdns-csi2rx
> > > failed with error -22
> > > 
> > > From a quick look it seems there is something in the port at 0 csi2rx entry. Do
> > > you happen to know what is wrong?
> > > 
> > 
> > You need to add your sensor node. You can refer to this patch:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20240119100639.84029-3-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com/
> > 
> > We suggest that using the imx219
> 
> Thanks for your answer. I do not have any sensor attached, the goal is
> to build a generic kernel, and people can use overlays or patch their
> device tree to add support for additional devices.
> 
> In that regard, I have the impression that csi2rx device (and maybe the
> camss device?) should not be marked as enabled in the default device
> tree. I think they could be enabled by users as part of the change need
> to add the sensor node.

Yeah, that's probably what should've been done when the imx219 node was
removed. Feel free to send a patch with a Fixes: tag for that removal
and a cc: stable on it - otherwise I'll send one out tomorrow or w/e.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20241014/35dda060/attachment.sig>