[PATCH] cfi: rust: pass -Zpatchable-function-entry on all architectures

Miguel Ojeda miguel.ojeda.sandonis at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 04:32:44 PDT 2024


On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:51 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote:
>
> So you could just copy the bits from core you need into the kernel tree
> and leave out those bits you do not, and ocassionally update them when
> needed, right?

Yes, but in practice it is a substantial amount of non-trivial code to
maintain and some of it is too tied to the compiler (e.g. using
compiler internal features), thus it would likely require maintaining
several variations in-tree to make it work across compiler versions.

Maybe when kernel has been compiling with stable Rust for a while, and
especially if `core` is split into "really tied to the compiler" and
"the rest", we could consider something like that. Personally I would
like to be in a position where we can try. Perhaps it could even help
to simplify gccrs' life compiling a smaller `core`.

Even then, we would need to see whether the tradeoff is worth it: we
may be able to customize `core` here and there, yes, but, for
instance, we could lose the ability to easily import other code out
there (virtually all Rust code uses `core`).

Cheers,
Miguel



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list