[PATCH v6 16/33] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 10:55:29PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:

> A lot of this patch and the previous one is similar to x86's and arm's. It great
> that we can have consistency around this behavior.

> There might be enough consistency to refactor some of the arch code into a
> kernel/shstk.c.

> Should we try?

I think so - I think we discussed it before.  I was thinking of looking
at it once the clone3() stuff settles down, I don't want to trigger any
unneeded refectorings there and cause further delays.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20241009/c3e02099/attachment.sig>