[RFC v1 5/5] dt-bindings: riscv: document vector crypto requirements

[Clément Léger]

On 03/10/2024 13:05, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 09:59:38AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/10/2024 18:10, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>>>
>>> Section 35.2. Extensions Overview of [1] says:
>>> | The Zvknhb and Zvbc Vector Crypto Extensions --and accordingly the composite extensions Zvkn and
>>> | Zvks-- (sic) require a Zve64x base, or application ("V") base Vector Extension.
>>> | All of the other Vector Crypto Extensions can be built on any embedded (Zve*) or application ("V") base
>>> | Vector Extension
>>>
>>> Apply these rules in the binding, so that invalid combinations can be
>>> avoided.
>>>
>>> Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/tag/riscv-isa-release-698e64a-2024-09-09 [1]
>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
>>> index abf2579171c5b..02b822bbf341d 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
>>> @@ -651,6 +651,38 @@ properties:
>>>              - contains:
>>>                  const: zve64f
>>>  
>>> +      - if:
>>> +          contains:
>>> +            anyOf:
>>> +              - const: zvbc
>>> +              - const: zvkn
>>> +              - const: zvknhb
>>> +              - const: zvks
>>
>> Shouldn't zvksed and zvksh be part odf this list ? My understanding of
>> the spec might be wrong but "Zvks--" seems like a poor-man's wildcard
>> for Zvks* extensions ?
> 
> I don't think so, there's a corresponding -- on the first line of the
> quote. I think it is some really odd styling that should be replaced by
> commas.
> 

Oh yes, my bad.