[PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Add missing per-arch include path

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 2:26 AM Björn Töpel <bjorn at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> patchwork-bot+netdevbpf at kernel.org writes:
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
> > by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii at kernel.org>:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:13:52 +0200 you wrote:
> >> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn at rivosinc.com>
> >>
> >> libbpf does not include the per-arch tools include path, e.g.
> >> tools/arch/riscv/include. Some architectures depend those files to
> >> build properly.
> >>
> >> Include tools/arch/$(SUBARCH)/include in the libbpf build.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Here is the summary with links:
> >   - [bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: Add missing per-arch include path
> >     https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/710fbca820c7
> >   - [bpf-next,2/2] selftests: bpf: Add missing per-arch include path
> >     https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/19090f0306f1
>
> Andrii, I just noted that this landed into bpf-next, and not bpf
> (fixes).

Hi Bjorn,

Yes, libbpf and selftests fixes are generally applied through
bpf-next, unless the issue is pretty bad and immediate.

I'm sorry, but unfortunately it's too late now to move those patches
as it's now been more than a month since they landed. For the future,
please let us know ASAP if you think patches were misrouted. I think
we are stuck with the need to do a stable backport for these, sorry.

>
> RISC-V libbpf/perf needs this fix in 6.12 to properly build. Would it be
> possible to have it in the bpf tree, and have it land in 6.12-rc7?
>
> Andreas that has a similar fix [1].
>
>
> Björn
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/mvm5xq44bqh.fsf@suse.de/