[PATCH v2 0/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc

[Kanak Shilledar]

Hi Conor,

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:34 PM Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 09:08:34PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote:
> > This series of patches converts the RISC-V CPU interrupt controller to
> > the newer dt-schema binding.
> >
> > Patch 1:
> > This patch is currently at v3 as it has been previously rolled out.
> > Contains the bindings for the interrupt controller.
> >
> > Patch 2:
> > This patch is currently at v2.
> > Contains the reference to the above interrupt controller. Thus, making
> > all the RISC-V interrupt controller bindings in a centralized place.o
>
> Don't do this, it breaks tooling:
>
>         b4 shazam 20240522153835.22712-2-kanakshilledar111 at protonmail.com
>         Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20240522153835.22712-2-kanakshilledar111 at protonmail.com/t.mbox.gz
>         Checking for newer revisions
>         Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
>         Analyzing 3 messages in the thread
>         Looking for additional code-review trailers on lore.kernel.org
>         Will use the latest revision: v3
>         You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
>         Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
>         Retrieving CI status, may take a moment...
>         ---
>           ✓ [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc: convert to dtschema
>             ✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
>             + Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>           ERROR: missing [2/2]!
>         ---
>         Total patches: 1
>         ---
>         WARNING: Thread incomplete!
>          Base: using specified base-commit 20cb38a7af88dc40095da7c2c9094da3873fea23
>         Applying: dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc: convert to dtschema
>
> If you change one patch in a series, the whole series gets a new version.
> Just let git format-patch do that for you with the "-v N" argument and
> you'll not have to worry about breaking people's tooling.

Sorry for the tooling breaking. I used the "-v N" argument to make the
v2 patches but I bumped up the "riscv,cpu-intc"patch
to v3 due to it being in v3 already and it gave errors in the previous
patchset and you mentioned that I missed the v3 in subject line.
How shall I proceed with this version mismatch? Shall I make the
patchset as v3 and have both the patches at v3?

> Patches themselves are
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>

I shall include this in my commit message. Is it required to bump the
version of the patch just for the reviewed flag?

> Cheers,
> Conor.

Thanks and Regards,
Kanak Shilledar