[PATCH v3 2/3] mm: Refactor update_mmu_tlb()
Bang Li
libang.li at antgroup.com
Tue May 21 08:36:51 PDT 2024
Hi David,
Thanks for you review!
On 2024/5/21 17:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.05.24 09:49, Bang Li wrote:
>> Remove update_mmu_tlb() from those architectures and define
>> generically via update_mmu_tlb_range(), removing the ability
>> for arches to override it.
>
> I'd suggest something like
>
> "mm: implement update_mmu_tlb() using update_mmu_tlb_range()
>
> Let's make update_mmu_tlb() simply a generic wrapper around
> update_mmu_tlb_range(). Only the latter can now be overridden by the
> architecture. We can now remove __HAVE_ARCH_UPDATE_MMU_TLB as well.
> "
Agree! Thank you for your suggestion, I will modify it in the next version
>
> [...]
>
>> +#ifndef update_mmu_tlb_range
>> +static inline void update_mmu_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> With that in patch #1
Thanks again.
Bang
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list