[PATCH] cpuidle: riscv-sbi: Add cluster_pm_enter()/exit()
Nick Hu
nick.hu at sifive.com
Wed May 15 05:15:24 PDT 2024
Hi Anup,
Thank you for your guidance.
After enabling the debug message, we found a way to solve the problem
by the following steps:
1. Add a compatible string in 'power-domains' node otherwise it won't
be the supplier of the consumers. (See of_link_to_phandle())
2. Move the 'power-domains' node outside the 'cpus' node otherwise it
won't be added to the device hierarchy by device_add().
3. Update the cpuidle-riscv-sbi driver to get the pds_node from
'/power-domains'.
So the DTS will be like:
cpus {
...
domain-idle-states {
CLUSTER_SLEEP:cluster-sleep {
compatible = "domain-idle-state";
...
}
}
}
power-domains {
compatible = "riscv,sbi-power-domains"
...
...
CLUSTER_PD: clusterpd {
domain-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP>;
};
}
soc {
deviceA at xxx{
...
power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
...
}
}
Regards,
Nick
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:54 PM Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 7:53 PM Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:20 PM Nick Hu <nick.hu at sifive.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ulf,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your valuable suggestion.
> > > I sincerely apologize for the delay in responding to your message. We
> > > have diligently worked on experimenting with the suggestion you
> > > provided.
> > >
> > > As per your recommendation, we have incorporated the "power-domains=<>
> > > property" into the consumer's node, resulting in modifications to the
> > > DTS as illustrated below:
> > >
> > > cpus {
> > > ...
> > > domain-idle-states {
> > > CLUSTER_SLEEP:cluster-sleep {
> > > compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> > > ...
> > > }
> > > }
> > > power-domains {
> > > ...
> > > ...
> > > CLUSTER_PD: clusterpd {
> > > domain-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP>;
> > > };
> > > }
> > > }
> > > soc {
> > > deviceA at xxx{
> > > ...
> > > power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> > > ...
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > However, this adjustment has led to an issue where the probe for
> > > 'deviceA' is deferred by 'device_links_check_suppliers()' within
> > > 'really_probe()'. In an attempt to mitigate this issue, we
> > > experimented with a workaround by adding the attribute
> > > "status="disabled"" to the 'CLUSTER_PD' node. This action aimed to
> > > prevent the creation of a device link between 'deviceA' and
> > > 'CLUSTER_PD'. Nevertheless, we remain uncertain about the
> > > appropriateness of this solution.
> > >
> > > Do you have suggestions on how to effectively address this issue?
> >
> > I totally missed this email since I was not CC'ed sorry about that. Please
> > use get_maintainers.pl when sending patches.
>
> I stand corrected. This patch had landed in the "spam" folder. I don't know why.
>
> Regards,
> Anup
>
> >
> > The genpd_add_provider() (called by of_genpd_add_provider_simple())
> > does mark the power-domain DT node as initialized (fwnode_dev_initialized())
> > so after the cpuidle-riscv-sbi driver is probed the 'deviceA' dependency is
> > resolved and 'deviceA' should be probed unless there are other unmet
> > dependencies.
> >
> > Try adding "#define DEBUG" before all includes in drivers/core/base.c
> > and add "loglevel=8" in kernel parameters, this will print producer-consumer
> > linkage of all devices.
> >
> > Marking the power-domain DT node as "disabled" is certainly not the
> > right way.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anup
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nick
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 4:13 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 18:26, Nick Hu <nick.hu at sifive.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 12:22 AM Nick Hu <nick.hu at sifive.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Ulf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:32 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 07:51, Nick Hu <nick.hu at sifive.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > When the cpus in the same cluster are all in the idle state, the kernel
> > > > > > > > might put the cluster into a deeper low power state. Call the
> > > > > > > > cluster_pm_enter() before entering the low power state and call the
> > > > > > > > cluster_pm_exit() after the cluster woken up.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nick Hu <nick.hu at sifive.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was not cced this patch, but noticed that this patch got queued up
> > > > > > > recently. Sorry for not noticing earlier.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If not too late, can you please drop/revert it? We should really move
> > > > > > > away from the CPU cluster notifiers. See more information below.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > > > > > > > index e8094fc92491..298dc76a00cf 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > struct genpd_power_state *state = &pd->states[pd->state_idx];
> > > > > > > > u32 *pd_state;
> > > > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > if (!state->data)
> > > > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > > > @@ -401,6 +402,10 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd)
> > > > > > > > if (!sbi_cpuidle_pd_allow_domain_state)
> > > > > > > > return -EBUSY;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > + ret = cpu_cluster_pm_enter();
> > > > > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rather than using the CPU cluster notifiers, consumers of the genpd
> > > > > > > can register themselves to receive genpd on/off notifiers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In other words, none of this should be needed, right?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > > > > > Maybe I miss something, I'm wondering about a case like below:
> > > > > > If we have a shared L2 cache controller inside the cpu cluster power
> > > > > > domain and we add this controller to be a consumer of the power
> > > > > > domain, Shouldn't the genpd invoke the domain idle only after the
> > > > > > shared L2 cache controller is suspended?
> > > > > > Is there a way that we can put the L2 cache down while all cpus in the
> > > > > > same cluster are idle?
> > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > Sorry, I made some mistake in my second question.
> > > > > Update the question here:
> > > > > Is there a way that we can save the L2 cache states while all cpus in the
> > > > > same cluster are idle and the cluster could be powered down?
> > > >
> > > > If the L2 cache is a consumer of the cluster, the consumer driver for
> > > > the L2 cache should register for genpd on/off notifiers.
> > > >
> > > > The device representing the L2 cache needs to be enabled for runtime
> > > > PM, to be taken into account correctly by the cluster genpd. In this
> > > > case, the device should most likely remain runtime suspended, but
> > > > instead rely on the genpd on/off notifiers to understand when
> > > > save/restore of the cache states should be done.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards
> > > > Uffe
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list