[GIT PULL] RISC-V Devicetrees for v6.10

[Conor Dooley]

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2024, at 12:21, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Cool, just wasn't sure if you were intentionally contradicting yourself
> > or if the "below" part had just been some general remarks. I'll try to
> > get a "revised" PR sent tomorrow.
> 
> Ok. To clarify: basing on a bugfix pull request is always fine
> since those are already in Linus' tree by the time I send my
> pull requests to him for the merge window, so the branch contents
> as seen by 'git request-pull' are clean.

Ye, I was pretty sure that this is what you meant, but didn't wanna have
my second attempt also go awry!

> 
> I also try hard (in general) to avoid dependencies between the
> soc/dt branch and any of the other branches, to be sure that
> there are no incompatible binding changes. This wasn't a
> problem here (I think), but if you send something late in the
> cycle, I pretty much don't want to have to think about that.

If there's anyone you don't need to worry about making incompatible
binding changes like that, it's probably Krzysztof or I. It'd be a
bit hypocritical of me to send you stuff like that..

I sent an "take 2" PR there, once the rebased branch had a chance to
appear in linux-next.

Cheers,
Conor.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20240508/395a81c3/attachment.sig>