[GIT PULL] RISC-V Devicetrees for v6.10

[Conor Dooley]

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2024, at 11:58, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:27:36AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 3, 2024, at 17:24, Conor Dooley wrote:

> >> If you are able to extract the DT bits that don't depend
> >> on other branches (jh7xxx, microchip, bindings and
> >> new files) and resend those, I could still add them to the
> >> same dt-late branch.
> >
> > The jh7xxx stuff does actually depend on another branch, although that
> > branch is fixes. Do you want that removed too? If you do, I'd say to
> > just drop the whole PR.
> 
> As I wrote below, it's fine to have a branch based on a
> fixes branch, so please keep that part.

Cool, just wasn't sure if you were intentionally contradicting yourself
or if the "below" part had just been some general remarks. I'll try to
get a "revised" PR sent tomorrow.

Cheers,
Conor.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20240507/167a1dd5/attachment.sig>